WORKING BETTER WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY COMMISSIONING TEAMS: A guide for providers

WORKING BETTER WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY COMMISSIONING TEAMS: A guide for providers

A note from the founder

After years of sitting in commissioning meetings — often late, often tense, usually under pressure — I started to notice one consistent pattern.

Providers regularly underestimate just how much pressure commissioning teams are under… and commissioners often underestimate how much providers are juggling on the ground.

I’ve worked on both sides of the table. I’ve been the person trying to place a child safely with limited options and shrinking budgets, and I’ve been the provider trying to do the right thing for children while keeping a service stable, staffed and safe.

One conversation has stayed with me over the years. A commissioner once said to me:

“If providers just told us their limits up front, we’d save hours of crisis matching.”

That comment stuck — not because it was critical, but because it was honest.

This guide is written for providers who want to work better, not harder, with local authority commissioning teams — and ultimately secure more stable, appropriate placements for children.

Start with understanding (without lowering your standards)

Commissioning teams are often operating in constant reactive mode. Rising demand, budget pressures, public scrutiny and system constraints mean decisions can feel rushed or impersonal.

Providers who recognise this reality — without compromising their own values or standards — are more likely to be seen as professional partners rather than “another name on the list”.

That perception matters more than many providers realise.

Be clear about what you offer — and what you don’t

Commissioners consistently value providers who are honest about:

  • Who their service works well for
  • Where the limits genuinely are
  • What good outcomes realistically look like

It can feel tempting to say yes “just this once”, especially in a crisis. But unclear these ‘yes’s’ often turn into unstable placements, strained relationships and avoidable breakdowns.

Clarity builds trust. Trust leads to better matching. Better matching leads to better outcomes.

Help commissioners plan ahead (even when you don’t need placements)

Commissioning is often crisis-led — but providers can quietly shift that dynamic.

Simple actions make a real difference and strengthen your partnership working:

  • Sharing likely vacancies early
  • Flagging upcoming developments or changes
  • Taking part in market engagement conversations even when you’re full

Small pieces of early information can move decisions away from panic mode — and that benefits everyone, especially children.

Professionally challenge poor referrals

Poor information leads to poor outcomes.

Providers should feel confident to:

  • Set clear minimum referral standards
  • Explain why specific information matters
  • Give respectful, constructive feedback when referrals are incomplete

When this is done calmly and professionally, it doesn’t damage relationships — it strengthens them. Over time, referral quality improves and trust grows.

Show your value, not just your price

Commissioners are under pressure to justify spend, often in environments where cost is heavily scrutinised.

Providers can support better decision-making by clearly showing:

  • How stability reduces breakdowns and emergency moves
  • The long-term value of skilled, consistent staff
  • The wider system impact of good, therapeutic care

This shifts conversations from “How much does it cost?” to “What does this prevent?”

Working with multiple local authorities

If you work across different councils:

  • Learn how each authority structures commissioning
  • Expect variation — and plan for it
  • Stay professional, even when things feel difficult

Consistency, clarity and calm professionalism are remembered — especially when things go wrong elsewhere.

Why this matters for children

When providers and commissioning teams misunderstand each other, children feel the impact first.

Rushed decisions, unclear matching and reactive placements increase instability — and instability is one of the biggest predictors of poor outcomes for children in care.

When providers are clear, honest and collaborative:

  • Placements are more appropriate
  • Moves are reduced
  • Children experience greater stability and trust

This isn’t about systems working better on paper — it’s about children feeling safer in real life.

Try this: one practical step you can take this month

Choose one of the following and put it into practice:

  • Write a short, honest “Who we’re not right for” statement and share it with commissioners
  • Review your referral acceptance criteria and make them explicit
  • Proactively email commissioning teams about likely vacancies — even if nothing is available yet
  • Ask a commissioner, “What information would make your job easier next time?”

Small, intentional actions often change relationships more than big strategies.

A final thought

Children’s residential and semi-independent providers do deeply important work, often under intense pressure. The care, patience and commitment you bring everyday matters.

Working well with commissioning teams isn’t about getting everything perfect. It’s about being open, professional and child-focused.

When providers and commissioners understand each other better, placements are more stable, relationships improve — and children are better supported and together great outcomes for children can be achieved. 

Scroll to Top